Friday, April 07, 2006

---Evil, evil Men. Pack of wolves. Elitist boys. Rapists. All 54 of them.

Those are just some of the names thrown around in the media as well as the blogsphere. Funny thing is, there are so many issues with this situation, one cannot seriously take the ‘victim’ side. Lets look at a few very simple and telling oddities….

First off, the ‘victim’ is a 28-year-old police psychology student at North Carolina Central University. Her parents said that she is trying to maintain a low profile to protect her children, ages 5 and 7. She works for Allure Escort Service. Yes, you read that correctly. She is holding a low profile yet she is a hooker. Uhuh… OK. Yes, that is what she is. Fact, deal with it

Then, supposedly, three of these young men had sexually assaulted this stripper/hooker.. er sorry ‘escort’.. Yet all 54 are paying the consequences for three (alleged) specific individuals. And there are consequences. They are being branded as rapist in class, by teachers, the media, and the town. Innocent until proven guilty eh? John Adams must be rolling in his grave right about now.

Not only that but, the coach has been pretty much beaten to a pulp to the point of resigning. Nice system. Oh, lets not forget that the media, in all its manipulative glory identify it as “a gang rape”. Thus implying that all 54 and their male cousins were involved. Nice copy that makes eh? Selling many papers lately?

Next we have the initial release of the allegations with the publishing of all the men’s names ad nauseum. Oddly, her name is nowhere to be seen. What happened to equal protection under the law? Facing ones accuser? nnocent until proven guilty? Oh wait, I forgot, protect the fema…er victim.

Enter the femishark frenzy in all its glory. Short of castration, these men, all 54 of them are guilty, plain and simple. Why? Because they are men, they are rapists. Young men from affluent families, but men none-the-less. Thus is the standard MO of the DV and rape industry. Yes, they are an industry, contrary to popular feminist dogma.

So now we start to look into this whole pathetic news story with a microscope. Mainly because the story is beginning to break down and the media has to somehow villify themselves by 'misdirection" and refocusing the story somehow. You know, to ensure that the victim is protected and the evil vile men are punished, at all costs.

Additional stories such as two women actually showed up, were contracted to do a strip tease act for the sum of 800.00 for a couple of hours, only to attempt to leave after 3 minutes.

This supposed event is again extended to a member of the team soliciting sex from the alleged victim for $300. She agreed, but later backed out for some reason. When the team member demanded his money back, she declined, and then requested $1500 or else she would claim she was raped. This would fit with the fact that she left the party, but was then convinced come back in the house.

Then there is the email claiming that they (the team) were going to get black dancers to the party for no other reason but to kill her (them). Notice now that it’s not just a rape issue, but also the tried and true, ace in the hole; race, has been brought to the table. Where is this critical piece of evidence? Has anyone see it? With Duke being virtually as ‘diverse’ as one can get, with approximately 47% black and 48 white (Fox News), you would think that the race issue wouldn’t even be brought up. If race was indeed so problematic at Duke, why is there not a cornucopia of stories with race being the center of the horn? But I digress.

Then we have the ole DNA angle. One would suspect that having all 54 men tested for DNA would either identify and thusly convict the proper assailants and vilifying the remaining 51 or so men (52 if you count the coach). But noooo. Gottah go forth with the new and improved Salem witch hunts. AP reported that the DNA results have been completed as much as 5 days ago. So why haven’t we heard the findings? Why are these men being raked through the coals? Why has their season been cancelled due to only three alleged assailants? Release the damned DNA findings and close this stupid case already. Incedently, the AP has also reported that a second battery of DNA test has been ordered... why? WTF was wrong with the first set? I know! They were 'unconclusive'. Translation, they proved that the men were not lying.

I wont even get into the part about the team, yess all of them, offered to take lie detector tests (actually truth verification tests) and the honchos that be declined. Again, why? Why would they not want to have this on their side during the trial as proof!? Hmm Maybe because it will once again prove that this is nothing more than a freakin witch hunt.

In my opinion, denying truth verification tests and holding back the DNA findings proves that there are issues with this whole thing. If DNA proves that the rape occurred, wouldn’t you think that they would want to get that information out, go to trial, convict, and then enable the poor victim “to begin the healing process”. Oh, and while we are at it, all the other men to get on with their lives too…If you don’t mind too much.

But wait! Just when you think this cannot get any more ridiculous than it already has, out comes a police report from 2002. According to a 2002 police report, the woman, a 27-year-old student at North Carolina Central University at the time, gave a taxi driver a lap dance at a Durham strip club. Subsequently, according to the report, she stole the man's car and led deputies on a high-speed chase that ended in Wake County.

Hold your horses now, there is more.. She claimed to have only doe this sort of employment twice! So cronologically, it must have been that one time in 2002 and then this time, in 2006. Yea! That's the ticket! Back to the facts...

Apparently, the deputy thought the chase was over when the woman turned down a dead-end road near Brier Creek, but instead she tried to run over him, according to the police report.

Additional information notes that her blood-alcohol level registered at more than twice the legal limit.

Wow! Now if that doesn’t make one wonder. Ponder for a second what the motives of this poor victim truly are. I’ll wait.

Now, I am NOT implying one single bit that these sorts of atrocities happen. But when an equal, and sometime more disturbing atrocity happens such as the media and campus conviction of these men without due process… well I have to call a spade a spade.

So far nothing is concrete with the exception of “no evidence has been found at the site of the alleged attack”, as stated by the local sheriffs office. Additionally, the prosecutors claim that 4 fingernails were found at the scene. Two questions, why did the local officials claim that nothing was found then. Secondly, she claimed to have scratched one of her assailants, which caused her fake nails to come off. Well, shoot, check the boys then! At least one of them MUST have some sort of superficial wound indicative of the supposed actions. Nope. No information on that either.
Oh and lets not forget this little nugget; “The identity of the 911 caller, however, is not yet known. She identified herself only as someone passing by the house, located on Buchanan Street near Duke. Although police generally have information about a 911 call location, as well as who placed it, a Durham police spokeswoman said Thursday they have neither in this instance.” Well, well, well, isn’t that convenient. Personally? I think that it was her gal pal that called the police. You know, to corrobera.... er protect her friend from the evil males.

So I ask you, why the filler busting hold up? Why are the DNA results being held? Why is there no corroboration of the supposed scratches of one of the assailants? What of the police that respond to a call where they somehow, unbeknownst to the whole freaking world, cannot verify who placed the call and from where.

There are just too many questions, with too many inconsistencies. Way too many PC angles with very little or actual investigative process.

With that, I leave you with the biggest question of all. If this supposedly happened, WHY HAS NOONE ACTUALLY BEEN CHARGED YET?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home